Evidence first, the AI's idea second, your decision always. A short list with an end. Not an endless feed of alerts.
Scans the system isn't sure about
The system won't guess on a messy scan. A misread mark and a real mix-up are very different, so it asks you.
Low-confidence scan — step 2 unreadable
Ishaan Banerjee Human review requiredHandwriting parse confidence 0.41 on Ishaan's worksheet, item 3. The machine can't tell a careless slip from a real misconception here, so it won't guess — your read decides.
MATH.FRAC.EQUIV.01 · Recognise and generate equivalent fractions
Re-scan suggested
Diya Patel Human review requiredTwo answer regions were left blank or scanned at an angle. Re-scan when convenient — no rush.
MATH.FRAC.MEANING.02 · Represent fractions on a number line and as part of a collection
Your call to make
The tutor only checks the mechanics. It never grades thinking. Meaning, argument, and voice are yours to judge.
Judgment node — does the idea land?
Aarav Sharma Human review requiredTense flips were auto-flagged (mechanical). Whether Aarav understood and carried the story is yours to decide — the tutor flags, it never scores thinking.
ENG.WRITE.NARR.05 · Develop a narrative with a clear, well-carried idea
Content to approve
Put together by trusted tools. A quick look before it reaches a child.
Support worksheet awaiting approval
Human review requiredAI-differentiated support sheet for today's equivalence group. Nothing reaches a child unreviewed — approve, edit, or reject.
MATH.FRAC.EQUIV.01 · Recognise and generate equivalent fractions